Home > Media, Social Media > Style Conscious: AP Style + Social Media

Style Conscious: AP Style + Social Media

stylebook_app_new-blogFrom the Desk of Ef Rodriguez…

On matters of style, PR peeps defer to the AP Stylebook as a rule – largely because some of our most critical interactions are with reporters and editors, almost all of whom adhere to AP style in their publications. To that end, we have all taken time (at one point in our careers) to learn AP thoroughly.

But as our communication targets widen to include consumers directly via social media, is our style changing to reflect that? As we reach out to people via social media, what are the new language standards as they relate to web parlance? (For example, I should have capitalized Web in the previous sentence, but that looks strange to me on a blog.)

At what point do we decide for ourselves how best to communicate with our audiences? Sure, the AP Stylebook is just a set of recommended guidelines – we are certainly free to write as we see fit. But for the sake of consistency, many pros side with AP style, even if it makes their online outreach seem a little stiff and oddly formal.

Consider words like:

  • tweetup
  • website
  • email
  • startup

How do you handle style issues as they relate to technology and social media? I know some agencies and companies have developed internal stylebooks – I’m starting to think that’s a good idea.

Categories: Media, Social Media Tags: ,
  1. October 12, 2009 at 4:30 pm | #1

    Thanks for this post. I just had an corporate debate regarding whether or not we should use Web site, Website or website. Much like you, I pushed for website because I think the term has become a common noun. Plus, I think it’s really important to consider the formality of these terms and the impact on your brand. Capital “Web site” doesn’t strike me as a company that’s fun, cutting edge and a bit irreverent.
    -bo

    • October 12, 2009 at 4:34 pm | #2

      You’re clearly a hyper-intelligent person, Bo. At this point (the tail end of 2009), using anything other than “website” is silly and arcane. I’ve had similar discussions and, since most of my work is performed online, website usually prevails.

      Your bravery should be applauded. Please imagine me clapping my hands boisterously in your general direction.

  1. No trackbacks yet.